[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
British involvement? (r)
At 04:39 AM 7/5/96, you wrote:
>From: David Hywel Phillips <hywel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Foreign Investment of Permitted Enterprises by Country
> (as of February 29, 1996)
>--------------------------------------------------------------
> Total Permitted Enterprises
>Sr. Particulars Sectors Approved Amount
> No. (US$ in million)
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------
> 1. Australia 6 30.00
> 2. Bangladesh 2 2.96
> 3. China 5 5.85
> 4. France 1 485.00
> 5. Hong Kong 17 64.44
> 6. Japan 6 118.21
> 7. The Republic of Korea 9 60.59
> 8. Macau 1 2.40
> 9. Malaysia 9 227.27
>10. The Netherlands 2 83.00
>11. Philippine 1 6.67
>12. Singapore 38 683.88
>13. Sri Lanka 1 1.00
>14. Thailand 29 421.12
>
>>15. U.K. 18 666.22
>
>16. U.S.A. 14 241.07
>17. Canada 6 25.03
>18. Austria 1 71.50
>--------------------------------------------------------------
> Total 166 3096.01
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>
>What are the British investments?
>
>Anyone?
>
>
>
>Hywel
>--
>The great bulk of the "british" investment is in the pipeline - Total are
booking a lot of the project through their UK arm CFP. Or possibly it is
registered in the British Virgin Islands. A number of Hong KOng companies
are also carrying out their Burma projects through the BVI, all of which
explains why the UK figure is so high. Remember also, all these figures are
"commitments" rather tahn actual investments. A lot will never happen.
>
>
>
>