Comments: Question to Freedom Fight (r)

[Winston_Lee@xxxxxxx]

Subject: Re: Comments: Question to Freedom Fighters about Peru

There is a clear cut between people who are "armed" & those who are not.

Now, unless the author was trying to parallel those <outside Burma fighting
peacefully in non-violent way for a good cause> to armed Shinning Path or
bloody Sinn Fein from Northern Eire ...

I absolutely agree with Lisa.  There aint no comparison whatsoever.
Extremist is extremist whether supported by common people or those who are
privileged.  Likewise, terrorism shouldnt be encouraged in a good cause at
any time.






>Subj:    Re: Comments: Question to Freedom Fighters about Peru
>Date:    97-04-28 23:43:49 EDT
>From:    lb252689@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Reply-to:     burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx (Conference reg.burma)
>To: burmanet-l@xxxxxxxxxxx (Recipients of burmanet-l)
>
>From: Lisa Booth Brooten <lb252689@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: Comments: Question to Freedom Fighters about Peru (fwd)
>
>It is dangerous to equate the situation in Burma with the TUPAC-AMARU,
>which is not, as I understand it, supported by a majority of the Peruvian
>people, and for however noble their reasons, was acting with violence
>against innocent people to make their point.  Also -- wasn't Fujimori
>elected?
>
>