[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
US SANCTIONS NOTABLE ,BUT INSUFFICI
- Subject: US SANCTIONS NOTABLE ,BUT INSUFFICI
- From: moe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 19:20:00
Subject: US SANCTIONS NOTABLE ,BUT INSUFFICIENT
29/5
US sanctions
notable, but
insufficient
By CESAR CHELALA
(c) Earth Times News Service
resident Clinton's announcement of sanctions against the Burmese
military junta is a welcome action by the US Administration.
However, significant as this move is, it is insufficient to truly
promote
change in that country unless coordinated as an international
response to
the human rights abuses of the Burmese junta. A course of stricter
sanctions, as proposed by Senators Mitch McConnell and Daniel P.
Moynihan, should be followed.
The ban on new US investments comes a a time when an estimated 260
opposition figures, many of them elected representatives of the
National
League for Democracy (NLD) party, are under detention and that party's
leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, is subject to persistent intimidation. With
positions hardened on both the government and the opposition side,
international support is now critical for Aung San Suu Kyi and for her
hopes of restoring democracy to her country.
Following the 1990 election--which Aung San Suu Kyi's party won by an
overwhelming majority--a systematic pattern of human rights abuses
by the
military has taken place in Burma, including arbitrary imprisonment and
torture, forced relocation and persecution of minorities. These
actions are
responsible for the exodus of hundreds of thousands of people to nearby
countries.
Although the Burmese military is trying to impose a veneer of
normalcy in
Burma, there is continuous opposition to its rule. In recent years, the
military regime has opened the economy and eagerly sought foreign
investment, while at the same time keeping a tight control on domestic
political expression, in the hopes that protests would wane and the
main
opposition party, the NLD, would become marginalized.
The policy of "constructive engagement" promoted by ASEAN (the seven
member Association of South-East Asian Nations) has clearly failed.
Supported in their belief that international recognition and normal
trade of
intimidating the opposition and abusing human rights. Nobel Peace Prize
laureate Desmond Tutu has remarked that years of constructive
engagement has only given the SLORC the confidence to keep its
oppressive rule. Last September, more than 500 members of the NLD
party were arrested.
The International Labor Organization (ILO) has accused Burma of using
forced labor to guard the Unocal/Total oil pipeline, a joint
American and
French investment, and there is evidence that the military has
leveled towns
located along the pipeline construction path. Many uprooted
villagers have
been forced to work for the military.
The UN and several international human rights organizations have
denounced the Burmese junta's use of forced labor to upgrade the
country's infrastructure. Since late 1989, more than 500,000 people
have
been forcibly moved from their homes to resettlement towns built by the
military.
Following international protests and boycotts by pressure groups,
several
transnational companies have pulled out of the country (the most
recent to
withdraw is Pepsico Inc.), indicating a definite change in the
international
community's attitude toward the military junta. These positive changes
could be further strengthened by more decisive moves by the US
Administration. Aung San Suu Kyi has repeatedly declared that no
business that wants to exert moral leverage should be engaged in Burma,
and she manifested her support for the boycotts against the junta.
The US government should continue to try developing a coordinated
response with its European and Asian allies to bar further
international
investment in that country. The struggle against South Africa's
apartheid
regime succeeded because of coordinated international resolve. That
same
resolve should now be shown in opposition to the Burmese junta. Such
actions would give additional support to Aung San Suu Kyi and increase
the possibilities of democracy returning to Burma. Perhaps then
Aung San
Suu Kyi's words will prove to have been prophetic. At one of the
weekend meetings in her house, addressing her followers, she remarked,
"The military will not defeat us. After all, the only thing they
have is their
guns."
Cesar Chelala, co-winner of an Overseas Press Club of America award
for the best article on human rights, writes frequently on foreign
affairs.