[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index ][Thread Index ]

Breaking News (Part 1) (r)



In a message dated 98-04-20 20:30:10 EDT, RANGOONP writes:

<< 
 Breaking News from The Rangoon Post
  These news are searched and posted by The Rangoon Post working group.
Indeed, we feel very sorry for all Burmese who are suffered by the regime at
home and abroad. We pray for all that freedom must be accomplished soon.   
 8888888888888888888888888888888888
  Copyright 1998 Mainichi Daily News   
                               Mainichi Daily News 
  
                              April  20, 1998, Monday 
  
 SECTION: Page 12; DOMESTIC 
  
 LENGTH: 395 words 
  
 HEADLINE: Gov't skeptical of  Burma's  taxation policies 
  
  BODY: 
    Procedure prevents some of its citizens from returning home 
  
    By Noriko Yamamoto 
  
    Mainichi Shimbun 
  
    Burmese authorities have been taxing their citizens living in Japan and 
 preventing some of them from returning home if they haven't paid up, sources 
 said. 
     Government officials have summoned Burmese envoys and urged that the 
 situation be rectified, as it is a "dubious stance under international law
for 
 one country to exercise its right to collect taxes" in another country. 
     The plight of many Burmese has also attracted the attention of human-
rights 
 activists. 
    "It's not like we are refusing to issue the immigration documents (needed
to 
 re-enter  Burma)  to people who have not paid their taxes," a Burmese
official 
 said. "If people who need the documents have paid their taxes, it's easier
for 
 us to believe they are our compatriots and check their identities." 
     Sources said that Burmese working in Japan are required to transfer 10 
 percent of their income as tax payments to a Burmese Embassy account.
However, 
 few have the money to pay the taxes after they have covered their debts or 
 living expenses. 
    The Burmese Embassy has reportedly billed many of those who wish to return
to
  Burma  for amounts ranging from several hundred thousand yen to 1 million
yen. 
 The embassy apparently refuses to provide those who fail to pay their taxes
with
 the immigration documents they need to return home, leaving them stranded in 
 Japan. 
    Immigration Bureau officials say about 9,700 Burmese are in Japan, 3,896
of 
 whom are registered foreign residents. The remainder are people who entered
the 
 country on short-term visas and stay here illegally. 
     Late last month, a 31-year-old Burmese man died of AIDS in a Tokyo
hospital. 
 The man, whose name has not been disclosed, said he wanted to return to
Burma  
 to see his son again before he died. However, as he could not pay a tax bill
of 
 approximately 600,000 yen to the Burmese Embassy, it would not issue him with
 the necessary immigration documents. 
     A woman who attended the man's funeral said the man had complained that
he 
 could not go home because he had not paid his taxes to the embassy. She added
 that the restaurant where the man had worked fired him after he became ill. 
 Hospitalized for the last four months of his life, he was apparently in too
much
 pain to even talk.             
 888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
                The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd.  
                              All Rights Reserved   
                                EIU Business Asia 
  
                                  April  20, 1998 
  
  
 COUNTRY: Myanmar ( Burma)  
  
 HEADLINE: Myanmar: Ugly, uglier, ugliest  
  
 For ASEAN, the main achievement of the first nine months of Myanmar's  
 membership was to hold a successful EU-ASEAN dialogue in London without  
 the presence of Myanmar representatives. Being forgotten, the Myanmar  
 military generals are able to get on with the job of weeding out their  
 more venal colleagues, preparing for an unfree and unfair election,  
 holding together a collapsing economy, suppressing a rural sector on the  
 verge of a famine induced by crop failure and bureaucratic mismanagement. 
 
 Myanmar's difficulties will no doubt continue to attract world attention,  
 but ASEAN has its own plights, and will prefer to put Myanmar on the back  
 burner. 
   
 For better 
   
 * Shake-up in the junta. Junta leaders have realised that some military  
 members were more equal than others in access to the spoils of office.  
 This is resulting in far-reaching changes, not only in organisation and  
 identity of office-holders but also in ethical practices in government.  
 The new State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) is the former State Law  
 and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) in sheep's clothing. The big  
 parasites, such as ousted tourism, trade and agriculture ministers, as  
 well as a range of lesser scavengers, have already been ejected. A total  
 of 14 ministers (members of SLORC) were ousted in the changeover, followed  
 by a revamping of the next level down, the Cabinet of Ministers. Although  
 these changes have not yet resulted in major policy shifts, they are  
 significant steps to ease out the old guard and promote technocratic and  
 better educated leaders. 
   
 * Democratisation, Myanmar style. The UN and foreign human rights  
 advocates demand implementation of the 1990 election results, which gave a 
 
 landslide victory to Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy. The  
 SPDC is hinting that a follow-on event is already overdue, however it will  
 be on the SPDC's terms. The National Convention Convening Committee is  
 reported to be speeding up its lethargic constitution writing. Myanmar's  
 rulers are looking to Cambodia and Indonesia as models, and hoping that a  
 less than free and fair electoral process might be acceptable to  
 international critics as seems to be the case with these neighbours. While  
 Myanmar is likely to be treated less benignly than such countries, any  
 moves towards democracy will bring about an easing of tension and an  
 eventual opening-up of the country to more genuine reforms. 
   
 * Energy-led Eastern Seaboard for Myanmar. While investment and tourism  
 slump, the Yadana gas pipeline project -- which forms the core of  
 Myanmar's potential future replica of Thailand's Eastern Seaboard  
 development zone -- has progressed. Environmental and human rights  
 protesters have held up but not prevented completion of the final stages  
 on the Thai side of the border. Gas will flow later this year, assuring  
 success to Total of France and Unocal of the US in what has been a highly  
 politically risky project. 
   
 However, the gas pipeline is only the first stage of what may become a  
 major development region, linking up Thailand's nascent western seaboard 
 
 area with its mirror image across the Myanmar border. Other plans are for  
 road and rail links, a deep-sea port, an industrial zone and other  
 facilities. Though likely to be delayed by the South-east Asian economic  
 crisis, the concept has high enough potential to succeed in the long term. 
   
 * Friends in need. Despite continuing pressures for change mainly from the  
 Western international community, Myanmar continues to enjoy steady support  
 from Singapore and Malaysia, including some modest investment flows. There  
 is also significant, but largely clandestine, Chinese support. Were it not  
 for the difficulties at home suffered by ASEAN countries, support for  
 Myanmar might have been more vocal. Under current circumstances, however,  
 ASEAN members are likely to continue to downgrade Myanmar in international  
 diplomacy, while continuing whatever economic support they can still  
 afford. 
   
 For worse 
   
 * Bitter harvest. Adverse weather conditions, including heavy flooding in  
 rice-growing areas, and the consequences of ill-conceived government  
 control of domestic and international trade, has resulted in severe rice  
 shortages locally and the virtual elimination of exports, desperately  
 needed to earn foreign exchange. Fearing a repetition of the 1988 crisis, 
 
 which led to civil insurrection and the collapse of the then leader Ne  
 Win's regime, reforms of rice-trading and pricing controls have been  
 instituted, and export trade has been re-opened to the private sector.  
 However, these reforms will be too late to alleviate the 1998 situation,  
 although emergency food aid from the UN's Food and Agriculture  
 Organisation and elsewhere should ensure basic supplies. However, much of  
 this aid risks falling into the hands of the military, police and civil  
 servants at subsidised prices, instead of going to the general public as  
 intended. 
   
 * Sinking the kyat. The kyat, nominally Asia's strongest currency, pegged  
 at Kt6:US$1, will continue to gyrate alongside the vagaries of official  
 monetary policy, tending closer towards Kt400:US$1 on the free (black)  
 market. Foreign exchange will eventually be bolstered by gas export  
 earnings. For the time-being, foreign reserves are likely to remain below  
 US$200m, depending on external payment obligations, which if met in a  
 timely fashion, would wipe out foreign resources altogether. In these  
 circumstances, investing or trading in the Myanmar market carries a high  
 risk premium. With tensions and intermittent shutdowns on the Thai border,  
 even smuggling is becoming more difficult. 
   
 * Investment: poor odds even for gamblers. With a US embargo in force, 
 
 restrictions imposed by the EU and Canada, and ASEAN in economic turmoil,  
 Myanmar has few sources to which it can readily turn, whether for  
 implementation of approved projects or for new investment. Over-optimism  
 in the hotel and tourism sector, and in other property-related sectors  
 too, has provided Myanmar with excess capacity for several years to come.  
 The weak domestic market and restricted export outlets, as well as  
 shortages of electricity and other handicaps, limit industrial  
 manufacturing investment. One source of opportunity may be privatisation  
 of state enterprises, but only after prices are market driven and  
 protectionist attitudes change. Furthermore the general investment climate  
 is continuing to deteriorate. 
   
   
   
 Key economic indicators, Myanmar 
   
   
                                   1995    1996    1997  
 Real GDP growth,%a                 6.9     5.8     5.0  
 Total consumption, %               6.4     2.6     3.5  
 Gross fixed investments, %        28.2    20.5     9.0  
 Consumer price inflation, %(b)    25.2    16.3    29.4 
 
 Interest rate, %(a),(b)           16.5    16.5    16.5  
 GDP at current prices, Kt bna    603.6   715.4   972.2  
 GDP, nominal, US$  bnc            106.5   120.9   156.1  
 GDP, nominal, US$  bnd              5.0     4.6     4.2  
 GDP per head, US$ (d)               112     101      90  
 Trade balance, US$  bn             -1.0    -1.1    -1.4  
 Current account balance,          -513    -515    -814  
 US$  ma  
 Official exchange rate, Kt:US$     5.67    5.92    6.24  
 Market exchange rate, Kt:US$        120     155     230 
   
 Note: 1995-96 actual, 1997 estimated. (a)Fiscal years beginning April 1st.  
 (b)Annual average. (c)At the official exchange rate (most recent:   
 Kt6.25:US$1 in Feb 1998). (d)At or using the market exchange rate (most  
 recent: approx Kt300:US$1 in Feb 1998). The US Embassy estimates that GDP  
 per head is US$200-300 if the extra-legal economy and the contribution of  
 uncompensated labour is included. 
   
 Source: EIU Country Reports and Country Risk Service
 8888888888888888888888
 The New York Times Company   
                                The New York Times 
  
                   April  19, 1998, Sunday, Late Edition - Final 
  
 SECTION: Section 1; Page 8; Column 3; Foreign Desk 
  
 
 HEADLINE: Where Opium Reigned, Burmese Claim Inroads 
  
 BYLINE:  By CHRISTOPHER S. WREN 
  
 DATELINE: LASHIO, Myanmar 
  In the remote valleys and rugged mountains here in northeastern Myanmar, 
 opium offers more than a narcotic high. For years, it has provided a
livelihood 
 for hill tribes who inhabit the northern expanse of the Golden Triangle, the 
 lush, lawless area of Southeast Asia that is the source of much of the
world's 
 heroin. 
  
 
    Opium finances daily needs, from rice and cooking oil to assault rifles.
The 
 rifles are used to wage rebellion and to defend the mule caravans
transporting 
 the sticky, pungent opium to be refined into heroin for American and European
 drug habits. 
  
     Myanmar, formerly  Burma,  produced an estimated 2,600 tons of opium last
 year, enough to make more than 200 tons of heroin -- at least 60 percent of
the 
 world total. But the drug trade is changing along Myanmar's porous frontiers 
 with Thailand, China and Laos, and one of the most startling shifts may be in
 the attitude of the military junta that seized power in this country in 1988.
  
    For years the junta tolerated opium trafficking as the price of its 
 cease-fires with insurgent ethnic groups. Now it says that it wants to
eradicate
 all opium within five years. To show what it has accomplished, it recently 
 allowed three American reporters into an opium-growing region usually closed
to 
 visitors. 
  
    Some diplomats in Yangon, the capital, view the eradication claim
skeptically
 because land devoted to opium cultivation has doubled under the junta's rule
and
 the country's mismanaged economy has grown to rely on laundered drug profits.
  
 
    The Government says it has eradicated 41,000 acres of poppies, one-tenth
of 
 the land under opium cultivation in Myanmar. "The crop eradication areas are 
 only small parts of the areas they do control," a Western diplomat said.
'They 
 are window dressing." 
  
    Col. Gyaw Thien, the chief of Myanmar's counternarcotics program,
disagreed, 
 declaring that the Government was being asked to solve a century-old problem
in 
 two weeks without any help. "It's quite unfair," he said. "We are making much
 more effective interdictions and seizures than we have in the past." 
  
    Last year, police and army units reported seizing 1.5 tons of heroin, 
 compared with about half a ton in 1996, though their record seizures amount
to 
 less than 1 percent of Myanmar's output. "This drug problem is not only the 
 problem of the United States," Colonel Gyaw Thien said. "It's our problem
too. 
 We know that we cannot fight this alone." 
  
    The junta's new policy puts Washington in a quandary because the United 
 States cut off counternarcotics aid to  Burma  after the coup in 1988.
Restoring
 such aid could undercut other American economic sanctions and lend legitimacy
to
 a dictatorship that stands accused of widespread abuse of human rights. 
  
 
    "We think we can get rid of 60 percent of the heroin going into the U.S.
in 
 12 months' time if the U.S. cooperates with us," said Lieut. Col. Hla Min,
the 
 deputy director of the Office of Strategic Studies, a planning branch of 
 military intelligence. 
  
    A Western diplomat who watched the shift concluded: "What this Government 
 wants to do is perpetuate itself in power. They know it's got a bad image.
They 
 looked at drugs and found this is the one asset they have. They'd like to use
 whatever they've done to improve their image and try to get sanctions
lifted." 
  
    The State Department acknowledges in its latest drug control report that
it 
 has no evidence that Myanmar's Government is trafficking in drugs on an 
 institutional level. 
  
    "However," the report said, "there are persistent and reliable reports
that 
 officials, particularly army personnel posted in outlying areas, are involved
in
 the drug business." 
  
    The Government denies this, citing the arrest of 11 army officers last
April 
 for colluding with a heroin refining operation in northern Shan state. The 
 senior officer, a lieutenant colonel, was sent to prison for 25 years. It
also 
 deported Li Yunchun, a fugitive trafficker indicted in New York, to Thailand,
 
 which handed him over to the United States. 
  
    But new traffickers, notably the Wa, a fierce hill people whose ancestors 
 hunted heads, have wrested control of the lucrative heroin business from 
 remnants of renegade Chinese Nationalist soldiers and rebel militias. 
  
    Nearly a million Wa straddle the border between China and Myanmar. Their 
 insurgent army has diversified from heroin into methamphetamines, powerful 
 synthetic stimulants that have saturated Thailand and since turned up in
Japan, 
 Taiwan and Malaysia, Burmese and Western officials say. A Burmese 
 counter-narcotics official said the Wa now make more money from
methamphetamines
 than from heroin and refine both drugs themselves using chemicals smuggled in
 primarily from China. 
  
    Because of aggressive action by the Thai police, the old trafficking
routes 
 through the Golden Triangle are shifting from Thailand into China, or less
often
 Laos and even northeastern India. Some heroin still moves by truck down from
the
 Shan highlands market town of Lashio, through lowland Mandalay to the port of
 Yangon, as Rangoon is now called. 
  
    Eradicating opium could help the military Government's strategy of
subduing 
 ethnic insurgents who traffic in opium to finance their wars of independence.
 
 Government troops cannot enter most Wa-controlled territory without a battle.
  
    With an army estimated at 15,000 to 20,000 men, the Wa have grown so
strong, 
 acquiring surface-to-air missiles and modern communications equipment, that 
 Government troops complain about feeling outgunned. Last summer, a 30-man 
 Government patrol was wiped out when it ran into a Wa mule caravan smuggling 
 methamphetamine to Thailand. 
  
    "The Burmese would like nothing better than to do away with the drug
trade," 
 another diplomat in Yangon said, "because it would take guns out of the hands
of
 these armies." 
  
    The Government's creation of a handful of opium-free zones has upset local
 farmers. "What we're talking about is really changing their life style," said
 Jorgen Kristensen, an official with the United Nations Drug Control Program, 
 which has introduced alternative development projects. "Poppy cultivation is 
 ingrained in their culture." 
  
    At Nam Tit, a Wa town about a half-hour's walk from the Chinese border, Zi
Zi
 Fa, a farmer in patched shirt and shorts, said his grandfather and father
grew 
 opium poppies. He earned about $650 for his own annual crop of 12 1/2 pounds
of 
 opium, which he did not need to take to market. "When I was growing poppies,"
 
 he said, "the buyer came to me." 
  
    Since the Government told him to grow soybeans instead, Mr. Zi said, he
earns
 one-tenth of what opium paid, not enough to feed 10 family members. 
  
    "The family is barely surviving," he said, echoing a complaint expressed
by 
 opium farmers in Afghanistan and coca farmers in Colombia and Peru. 
  
    "If we did not grow poppies, our income would not last more than one or
two 
 months," he said. 'In the high mountains, rice doesn't grow, and it's too
cold. 
 The corn is fit only for the pigs." 
  
    In the nearby border town of Chin Shwe Haw, Kyan Ti Jy, a farmer from the 
 ethnic Chinese Kokang minority, said, "We earned more money growing poppies,
but
 our leader said to stop growing opium." Mr. Kyan obediently planted lichee
trees
 and sugar cane. Now, he complained, "nobody's buying sugar because there's no
 mill." Construction on a sugar refinery is not expected before September. 
  
    With their incomes slashed by more than half, "the farmers are not very 
 happy," said a local official, Kyan Tin Wan. 
  
 
    "But the Government is giving out rubber plants and lichee trees almost
free 
 of charge, and free fertilizer," he said. 
  
    It will take at least three years for the lichee trees to bear fruit. In
the 
 meantime, Kyan Tin Wan said, "large families who cannot stand it are going
out 
 of designated opium-free areas to where the Government cannot touch them." 
  
    The official conceded that even farmers who gave up opium as a crop "still
 might be growing a little bit here and there for medicinal purposes." 
  
    At his base in Lauk Kai, the Kokang political leader, Peng Jiasheng, said
it 
 was hard for his people to stop growing opium. 
  
    "We admit there is poppy growing in this area to a certain extent, but not
 the way we've been portrayed," he said. "It's not that the leaders are buying
 opium and taking it down to the Golden Triangle. We're not involved in that."
  
    Before the Kokang concluded a cease-fire with the Burmese Government in
1989,
 Mr. Peng trafficked in opium himself. 
  
    "When we were insurgents, we needed to expand our army and we needed
weapons 
 and food," he said. "For that we needed to grow more poppies." 
 
    His troops did not cultivate opium, Mr. Peng said, but levied a 40 percent
 tax on what local farmers produced. "Seventy percent of the people in this
area 
 were supporting us financially for the insurgency," he explained. "But now 
 there's no more fighting and our troops are drastically reduced." At the
height 
 of the rebellion, he said, the Kokang and Wa could field 60,000 soldiers
between
 them. Now, he insisted, his troops have dwindled to 500. 
  
    "Today it's peaceful, so we don't need to grow poppies," the Kokang leader
 said, waving a hand adorned with a heavy gold bracelet and gold rings. "If my
 people can have their stomachs full and something appropriate to wear, they
are 
 happy enough. They don't need anything more." 
  
    Taking the profit out of opium may be the toughest challenge because when
the
 leader of a drug operation quits, contenders jockey to replace him. For
years, 
 Khun Sa and his narco-army dominated the heroin trade under the guise of 
 fighting for Shan self-determination. After some of his troops mutinied, Khun
Sa
 negotiated his surrender in January 1996 and lives comfortably, but in poor 
 health, under Government observation in Yangon. 
  
    "We were fighting him for years," Colonel Hla Min of the Office of
Strategic 
 Studies said, justifying the Government's accommodation with Khun Sa. "We
were 
 not gaining much ground because he was well equipped, well dug-in, and the 
 
 terrain was terrible. We were sacrificing too many casualties." 
  
    "Khun Sa is a walking encyclopedia regarding the drug issue," Colonel Hla
Min
 said. "Everything he knows, we know. But this is a multibillion-dollar 
 business." 
  
    The vacuum left by Khun Sa was soon filled by Wei Hsueh-kang, a Wa
commander 
 who is said to have 7,000 troops protecting his heroin and methamphetamine 
 operation. "All information is that he's getting larger by the day," said a 
 Western official who follows narcotics matters. 
  
    For all the heroin they export to the United States and Europe, such
leaders 
 do not tolerate its use in their own ranks. Khun Sa detoxified errant
soldiers 
 in cages exposed to the blistering sun or in soggy holes in the ground. While
 older Kokang people may use opium as medicine, Mr. Peng said, heroin "is not 
 medicine, so there's no excuse." 
  
    "Trading in heroin is a serious offense," he said. "We shoot the person." 
  
 GRAPHIC: Photo: A militiaman from the Wa tribe, the major Burmese opium 
 traffickers, in a poppy field near the Chinese border. The sale of opium pays
 for the Wa rebellion against the Burmese authorities. (Christopher S.
Wren/The 
 
 New York Times) 
   
 Map: "Cash Crop" shows the density of opium poppy cultivation in Southeast
Asia.
   
 Graph tracks Myanmar's opium production, in tons, from 1986 through 1997. 
 (Source: U.S. State Department) 
  >>