[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index
][Thread Index
]
BP: A sorry lack of basic humani
- Subject: BP: A sorry lack of basic humani
- From: suriya@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 20:49:00
June 4, 1998
Commentary
by Sanitsuda Ekachai
A sorry lack of
basic humanity
Peeping Toms have a field day every day in front of the
Thanyaburi Women's Shelter. At 7 a.m. and again at 3.30 p.m.,
motorcyclists gather to watch the female inhabitants queue for
their two minute bath - stark naked in full public view.
While motorcyclists must crane their necks for a peek, people in
the six-storey building nearby have a full view just by looking
down. Such is the punishment for the crime of poverty. These
women are not criminals. They are merely poor, homeless folk
who have been rounded up for begging on the street. But
because they are poor and powerless, they are treated like
cattle.
It escapes me how on Earth the shelter superintendent - a
woman herself - could be so heartless. Where's the empathy?
Cruelty is sinful. Poverty is not. Who's the real criminal here?
These ugly circumstances became public when angry neighbours
felt the shelter authorities were violating the occupants' human
rights. They also fear that some Peeping Toms might get the
wrong idea and break into the compound to rape the women.
The inhumanity at the Thanyaburi Shelter, where some 200
women are being "rehabilitated", is not an isolated case. It is
typical of the human rights violations in state homes which
operate like prisons and treat the inhabitants like criminals. The
Department of Public Welfare's state homes are notorious for
their oppressive rule, be they orphanages or rehabilitation
centres.
In the orphanages, the officers' convenience and routine often
come before the children's need for individual attention. Sexual
abuses are a hush-hush issue in homes for older children. The
term "rehabilitation homes" - be they for juvenile delinquents, sex
workers or the homeless - is just a euphemism for "prisons".
That's why the activities there aim to dehumanise the inhabitants.
That's why we often hear of escape attempts. It's not because
the escapees are a violent lot but because the abuses have
become intolerable.
We must put an end to this oppression.
The authorities would surely cite the necessity for standard rules
and regulations when dealing with large groups of people. In the
case of Thanyaburi Shelter, we can also expect the standard
excuse of scarce funds and personnel.
They might even argue that military-like discipline is not all bad.
If it is, why do we allow schools to be run like military camps,
what with the soldier haircuts, the emphasis on mass conformity
and the many other authoritarian rules?
Oppression in state homes and schools grows from the same
seed as dictatorship in our hearts and minds. It's why we cannot
hope to see improvements in state homes, or schools for that
matter, by giving them more money and personnel. Change must
start with how we view education, power and relationship
patterns in order to maintain peace and harmony.
If we believe that power and control are the most effective
means to create order, then we will educate our children to be at
home with a militaristic culture. In the same manner, we will
accept that force is necessary to deal with misfits. But if we view
education as a process to bring out the best in people, schools
will become a nurturing ground for our children's creativity. And
rehabilitation homes a place to equip the weak with self-esteem
and skills so they can return to society with dignity.
As for the Thanyaburi shame, it's the authorities there - not the
women - who need re-education, particularly on the subject of
humanity.
* Sanitsuda Ekachai is Assistant Editor, Bangkok Post.
sanitsuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
© The Post Publishing Public Co., Ltd. All rights reserved 1998
Contact the Bangkok Post
Web Comments: Webmaster
Last Modified: Thu, Jun 4, 1998