Environmental governance in Burma/Myanmar
Individual Documents
Sub-title:
Conflict and dams on the Nam Teng in Shan State
Description:
"... Table Contents: Summary, Historical and cultural significance of the Nam Teng River: flowing through contested lands, Birthplace of Shan “Romeo and Juliet”, An artery of Shan resistance, 1996-1998: forced depopulation along the Nam Teng, Burma Army build-up in central Shan State, Background of Kengtawng, Militarization in Kengtawng, The Kengtawng hydropower project, Impacts of the Kengtawng project, Downsized waterfalls, Decreased fish stocks, The Upper Kengtawng dam, Feared impacts, Parched agriculture, Health risks due to changed water quality, Further decrease in fish stocks, Disappearance of waterfalls, Unpredictable water releases, Dam breakage, Centralized energy planning and foreign investment fueling conflict ..."
Source/publisher:
Shan Human Rights Foundation (SHRF)
Date of publication:
2018.12.03
Date of entry/update:
2020-01-19
Grouping:
Individual Documents
Category:
Water resources of Burma/Myanmar, Environmental governance in Burma/Myanmar, Conflict in particular States
Language:
Format :
PDF
Size:
29.23 MB
Local URL:
more
Description:
"Myanmar is blessed with diverse ecosystems,
rich biodiversity and bountiful natural resources. The
health of these ecosystems is essential for the country’s
development and the people’s wellbeing, given that all
economic and social sectors depend on its natural
capital. Yet many of our country’s natural resources and
environmental assets are under pressure due to a
number of different causes. Deforestation, mangrove
loss, illegal wildlife trade, unregulated mineral
extraction and environmental quality deterioration are
just some of the ongoing threats to Myanmar’s natural
capital. Without sound environmental governance, rapid
economic development could further exacerbate these
existing environmental problems. As a result of the
opening of the country’s economy, increasing foreign
and domestic investment is contributing to an
intensification of industrial activity and rapid urban
expansion....မြန်မာနိုင်ငံ အမျိုးသားပတ်ဝန်းကျင်ထိန်းသိမ်းရေမူဝါဒ.."
Source/publisher:
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme)
Date of publication:
2019-06-05
Date of entry/update:
2019-08-31
Grouping:
Individual Documents
Language:
Format :
pdf
Size:
496.51 KB
more
Description:
"While Burma?s ethnic states are blessed with a wealth of natural resources and biodiversity, they
have been cursed by the unsustainable extraction and sale of those resources, which has fuelled
armed conflict. Instituting a system of devolved federal management of natural resources can
play a key role in resolving conflict and building a lasting peace in Burma.
Despite some ceasefires on paper, Burma remains in a state of conflict. Ongoing offensives in
Kachin and Shan states alone have left hundreds of thousands homeless. Fundamental calls for
self-determination have gone unheeded in a lack of political dialogue to end decades of fighting.
Military offensives into resource-rich ethnic areas have expanded Burma Army presence in plac
-
es previously controlled by de-facto ethnic governments. This has facilitated the rapid increase
in the extraction and sale of natural resources in recent years. Resource projects have collected
huge revenues for the army and the central government, but have not benefited local populations.
Constitutional powers place natural resource ownership, control, and management fully in the
hands of the central government. This report analyzes six key natural resources: forests, land,
water, minerals, gems, and oil and gas. In each sector, a series of laws and practices prevent
affected peoples from having a say in their own development: they cannot assess, provide input
into, or censure the management of their natural resources. Ethnic women, particularly in rural
areas, are doubly marginalized from natural resource governance.
Centralised resource control is fanning the flames of discontent and anger
. Resource projects are
causing environmental destruction, human rights abuses, and loss of livelihoods, with unique
impacts on women. Extracting and exporting raw, often non-renewable, resources is further
inflicting an incalculable liability on future generations. Resources used to produce ener
gy are
consistently prioritised for export, contributing to the development of neighboring countries
while resource-rich areas remain in the dark.
People from across the country have staged protests and demonstrations, calling for an end to
destructive resource exploitation and for constitutional rights to own, control, and manage their
own resources. Ethnic political parties and armed groups are standing with the people in these
demands. Devolved decision-making offers stronger accountability and representation at all
levels of government, an opportunity for local input and control, benefits to local populations,
and environmental sustainability.
Burma does not need to start from zero in developing devolved governance structures. Local
communities have managed lands, water, and forests with sustainable customary practices for
generations, and de-facto governments have supported such practices with formal structures and laws..."
Source/publisher:
Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG)
Date of publication:
2017-10-24
Date of entry/update:
2017-11-19
Grouping:
Individual Documents
Category:
Forest policy in Burma/Myanmar, Decentralisation (Decentralization) in Burma/Myanmar, Environmental governance in Burma/Myanmar, Land confiscation for military, commercial and other purposes, Extractive industries (general) - Myanmar
Language:
English, Burmese (မြန်မာဘာသာ)
Format :
pdf
Size:
2.43 MB
Local URL:
more
Description:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: "The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is a framework for national
action for the conservation of biodiversity, the sustainable use of its components, and the
equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources. According to
Article 6 of the Convention, each member country needs to develop its own National
Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) to integrate conservation and the sustainable
use of biodiversity. In order to fulfill this commitment to the Convention, Myanmar conducted a
project entitled National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan in Myanmar (NBSAP
Myanmar). The Government Meeting No. 17/2006 of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar,
held on 25th May 2006, approved to formulate NBSAP of Myanmar. The United Nations
Environment Program (UNEP) and Global Environment Facility (GEF) agreed to support the
technique and funding in formulating NBSAP. With approval of the Government Meeting No.
11/2009 of of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar held on 19th March 2009, Forest
Department of the Ministry of Environmental Conservation and Forestry, the Republic of the
Union of Myanmar has signed the Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with UNEP, a GEF
Implementing Agency, which is also accountable to the GEF Council for GEF financed
activities, on 10th April 2009.
The NBSAP is the outcome of extensive data and information collating and analysis, as
well as a series of workshops and working group meetings with participation from government
departments, NGOs, and academic institutions. Based on the consultations, discussions,
comments, suggestions and updated information of biodiversity and natural resources in the
country, the NBSAP has been prepared and approved by national stakeholders. The NBSAP will
act as the major guiding document for planning biodiversity conservation in the country,
following its goal to provide a strategic planning framework for the effective and efficient
conservation and management of biodiversity and natural resources based on greater
transparency, accountability and equity. On 3rd May of 2012, the Government of the Republic of
the Union of Myanmar adopted the Myanmar NBSAP by its Government Meeting No. 16/2012.
The NBSAP is composed of six major chapters, which start with a general description of
Myanmar?s biodiversity and then extends to a strategy for the sustainability of biodiversity
conservation.
Chapter 1 provides a general introduction to Myanmar, as well as objectives and
methodology of the NBSAP. In Chapter 2, a detailed description about the diversity in
ecosystems, habitats and species in Myanmar is presented, including the indication on species?
status as being endemic, threatened or invasive. Chapter 3 discusses the background of national
policies, institutions and legal frameworks applicable to biodiversity conservation in Myanmar.
Chapter 4 analyses and highlights conservation priorities, major threats to the conservation of
biodiversity as well as the important matter of sustainable and equitable use of biological
resources in Myanmar. Chapter 5 presents the comprehensive national strategy and action plans
for implementing biodiversity conservation in Myanmar within a 5-year framework that includes
strengthening and expanding on priority sites for conservation, mainstreaming of biodiversity
conservation in other sectors and policies, implementing of priority species conservation,
supporting for more active participation of NGOs and other institutions in society towards
biodiversity conservation, implementing actions towards biosafety and invasive species issues,
strengthening legislative process for environmental conservation and enhancing awareness on
biodiversity conservation. In this chapter, sustainable management of natural resources and
development of ecotourism are also mentioned. Chapter 6 presents the required institutional
mechanism for improving biodiversity conservation, the monitoring and evaluation of the
implementation, as well as sustainability, of the NBSAP.
It is trusted that the NBSAP provides a comprehensive framework for planning biodiversity
conservation, management and utilization in a sustainable manner, as well as to ensure the long
term survival of Myanmar?s rich biodiversity."
Source/publisher:
The Republic of the Union of Myanmar
Date of publication:
2014-04-30
Date of entry/update:
2014-05-23
Grouping:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Format :
pdf pdf
Size:
2.84 MB 5.49 MB
more
Description:
Conclusion:
"With its continuing political instability, war and repression, Burma
stands to lose much of its remaining natural resources at an alarming
rate. The military regime?s protection and conservation of natural
resources and the environment as a national endeavour? has been
couched in progressive language. The drafting and implementation
of its National Environmental Policy is, however, yet to produce
appropriate institutional mechanisms. Any strategic environmental
engagement with the military regime will have to bear in mind that a
fruitful result for sustainable environmental governance in Burma, and
consequently in the ASEAN and Mekong regions, will depend on the
existence of good governance practice in a broader sense. Transparency,
accountability, rule of law, an independent judiciary system and
mechanisms to include local participation in environmental decision
making are essential for good governance practices. Burma lacks most
of these elements, although there are some limited possibilities for local
participation, as can be seen from the success of the UNDP?s projects.
Therefore, until and unless national reconciliation is reached and
political differences are resolved among all concerned parties, Burma?s
environmental future will be held hostage by political instability. It is
desirable that the short-term successes of the projects discussed in this
chapter lead to the rescuing of the hostage.
It is crucial that the leaders of the SPDC regime realise that the
existence of human civilisation depends inevitably on the harmonious
relationship between society and the environment. The common finding
of scientists who study the reasons behind the survival and collapse of
earlier civilisations is that those civilisations collapsed due to a lack of
vision and a lack of institutional arrangements to achieve a balanced
relationship between society and the environment (Hodell et al. 1995;
Weiss and Bradley 2001; Haug et al. 2003). The great lesson that the
SPDC generals can learn from the collapse of states in the past is that
the meaningful development of a society and the continuing existence
of a civilisation depend on human ideas, capacities and political
freedom within that society. Burmese society is endowed with ideas and
capacities; what is lacking is political freedom for citizens to exercise
their ideas and capacities. If current political deadlocks continue to
deny citizens the political freedom to chart their own livelihoods and
self-governance into the future, Burma?s civilisation and its continued
existence in the modern context will be at risk. This assessment of
environmental governance under the SPDC would have to conclude
that the primary responsibility for charting better environmental
governance in Burma lies in the hands of the SPDC generals."
Tun Myint
Source/publisher:
2006 Burma Update Conference via Australian national University
Date of publication:
2007-01-00
Date of entry/update:
2008-12-30
Grouping:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
more
Description:
"Since the ruling State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) took power by military
coup on September 18, 1988, the regime has intensified use of Burma?s natural
resources. Desperately needing hard currency to sustain its military and engage in
political and armed "annihilation" of various insurgent groups, the regime began
exploiting the country?s natural resources imprudently, and at an alarming rate. Since
1962 the Burmese economy had been centralized. However, beginning in 1989, SPDC
adopted an open economic policy. The declaration of "Open Door" policies in early 1989
attracted foreign investment. The flood of foreign investment into various sectors of the
economy brought concern for environmental issues..."
Tun Myint
Source/publisher:
Regional Environmental Forum - CICP, WRI, TEI - November 2002
Date of publication:
2003-05-00
Date of entry/update:
2003-06-03
Grouping:
Individual Documents
Language:
English
Format :
pdf
Size:
149.97 KB
Local URL:
more